List and description of business organizational design frameworks with assessment tool
Business Organizational Design Framework Assessment
This assessment gives leadership teams a structured way to test whether their current organization design truly enables the strategy—or quietly works against it. Instead of debating org charts in the abstract, it translates proven models (McKinsey 7S, Galbraith’s Star, Mintzberg, Competing Values, Burke–Litwin, and others) into a practical, step-by-step process. Leaders answer staged questions, see clear patterns, and receive a fit-for-purpose recommendation—often a hybrid—tailored to their realities. The aim isn’t theory for theory’s sake; it’s to expose misalignments in decision rights, structure, talent deployment, culture, and information flow, then point to specific moves (pilots, role clarity, operating cadences, KPIs) that unlock execution, reduce friction, and accelerate growth.
What It Does
-
Aligns structure to strategy: Checks how well strategy, structure, systems, people, and culture reinforce each other.
-
Diagnoses gaps fast: Reveals where hierarchy, agility, talent use, or execution are out of sync.
-
Recommends frameworks (or hybrids): Points to a primary model and suggests hybrid approaches when multiple are relevant.
How It Works
-
Answer staged questions in three passes—Strategy & Structure, Workforce & Culture, and External Environment & Adaptability.
-
Look for answer patterns (“mostly A/B/C…”) to identify the best-fit framework(s).
-
Use hybrid guidance when results are mixed, then move into an implementation roadmap with phases and milestones.
What It Evaluates (Plain English)
-
Strategy & Structure: Decision rights, change approach, and the degree of centralization vs. flexibility.
-
Workforce & Culture: How work is organized (hierarchy, matrix, autonomous teams), performance drivers, and cultural emphasis.
-
External & Adaptability: Market stability/volatility, information flow, technology posture, and mechanisms for cross-functional integration.
The Recommendation Engine (Examples)
-
Mostly “A/B” responses → models that balance structure and growth (e.g., Star Model, 7S, Ambidextrous/Adhocracy).
-
Mostly “C/D/E/F” mixes → change, culture, information-processing, or network-based models; tool suggests pairings (e.g., Burke-Litwin + Bridges; Socio-Technical + ONA).
-
No clear majority → follow the hybrid guidance to combine two or three models that match your pain points.
A Quick Story
A midsize services firm feels “busy but stuck.” Sales wants speed; operations wants standardization; HR sees burnout; the market is getting choppier. Running the assessment shows “Strategy & Structure” scores that lean matrix/ambidextrous while “Workforce & Culture” points to a hierarchy that’s too rigid. The tool recommends Galbraith’s Star as the primary frame with Competing Values to shift culture and a Bridges/Lewin combo for change management. In a leadership workshop, they pilot cross-functional pods in one region, set clear decision rights, and establish a cadence for learning. Sixty days later, handoffs are cleaner, rework drops, and time-to-decision improves.
When to Use It
-
Before a reorg or operating-model refresh
-
After rapid growth, acquisitions, or strategy shifts
-
During annual planning to ensure structure keeps up with goals and market realities
What Leaders Get Out of It
-
Clarity in one tool: A common language to discuss design choices without jargon.
-
Right-sized solutions: A shortlist of frameworks—and specific hybrids—matched to your realities.
-
Execution momentum: A phased roadmap with pilots, KPIs, owners, and feedback loops.
Implementation Tips
-
Run a leadership review of results; align on the primary or hybrid model.
-
Customize and pilot in a contained area; capture lessons before scaling.
-
Use structured change (e.g., Bridges or Lewin) to support the human side.
-
Track KPIs and conduct quarterly/semi-annual check-ins; refine as you go.
Bottom line: This assessment turns organizational design from ad-hoc tinkering into a repeatable, evidence-based decision. It shows where your structure helps—or hinders—your strategy and gives you a clear path to align people, processes, and culture for long-term success.
